I’m in a bit of a down period for historical mysteries, though I am reading a pretty good non-fiction book right now (description coming next week). In the meantime, I’d like to take this opportunity to describe a couple of the great resources for historical mysteries listed on my blogroll on the right.
First off is the tripod site on Historical Mystery Fiction managed by N.S. Hurt. The core sections of this terrific site are the author and time period indexes. The database fields for each index include author, title, period and location. Unfortunately, the two indexes are not hyperlinked.
I immediately felt a kindred spirit with Ms. Hurt after reading her lengthy description of the criteria for a “historical mystery.” She brilliantly explains date restrictions and why historical novels, regency romances, science fiction and time travel mysteries don’t fit this sub-genre. My list is a bit more inclusive when it comes to Sherlockian mysteries, but it’s a minor quibble.
The feature I use most often is the new title list, updated every two months. There are usually between two and four dozen new titles to examine, plenty to keep even the most voracious of readers busy. Another nice feature is a special section of titles for children and young adult readers.
So a big thank you to Ms. Hurt for putting her site together, maintaining it and making it available to readers.

Beauty and the Geek
Published September 19, 2007 tv commentary Leave a CommentOne of my guilty pleasures on tv, Beauty and the Geek, is back for its fourth season on the CW. I am certainly socially-inept enough to be one of the geeks, though I imagine my IQ is too low and my age too high. I especially love watching the auditions. Whereas the guys take their work very seriously and seem unable, or unwilling, to describe it in non-technical terms, they also seem to revel in, or at least accept, their geekiness. However, I don’t understand the women applicants at all. Don’t they know that the producers of the show are going to edit the tape to make them look really stupid? Are they so self-secure because of their beauty that they just don’t care? This year’s selections to make the show were a bit predictable, but when you are looking for a specific type of reality show contestant, I guess this is to be expected by the fourth season. Having said that, I think this year’s group of guys is pretty good, but I did not find the women to be particularly attractive. Maybe when we see more of their personalities in future show, someone will shine through and hopefully, they’ll get along better than last year’s felines.
I do like the introduction of the female geek and male beauty couple, though this may be considered the “jump the shark” moment for the show. However, I don’t think they’ll last long in the competition. For what it’s worth since I haven’t done well in the past, I’m picking Hollie and Josh to win.
During the first challenge, the geeks had to demonstrate how they would kiss their girlfriend using a mannequin. Did the producers intentionally position the mannequin, Molly, in such a defensive posture? She was quite tall, taller than several of the guys, and was leaning far backward away from the guys, making it difficult for many to even reach her face.